A common PEDs recommendation is testosterone + primobolan or masteron, with the disclaimer that “primo and mast are about equal, but maybe primo is better on the margins, however it is more expensive.”
So we were asked, “the more expensive is self explanatory, but how is it better on the margins? Is it due to side effects, the resulting gains, etc?”
Also, if someone is spending the extra money on primo, they’d want to know what that marginal effect is, when to use primo vs. mast, and so on.
Let’s hear from Joe:
The benefit would only be in the fact that primo appears to be more benign per mg in terms of effects on bloodwork than masteron. The anabolic effects will not differ to any statistically significant degree.
So if you can hack it price-wise, use primo?
Let’s ask Matt:
Exactly that. If you can handle the cost and the mg/ml, then primo is the best option always.
If someone is at a spot where they’re using a mix of test and primo, and side effects are agnostic whether they add 50mg of primo or 50mg of mast, would adding additional test still be the first choice? After all, it’s certainly a lot less volume of oil!
If you can tolerate more E2, always increase test first!
Choosing test, due to conversion to E2 and DHT, offers a host of additional benefits that no other drug (that we recommend) provides. The caveat is, as long as you can tolerate it. Hence, we would always recommend running test as high as you can tolerate. Look out for a video dropping soon where Joe and I cover this in detail.
The Physique Collective Edge isn’t taking more drugs, or learning some super secret formula, but rather that, to a degree, health doesn’t have to go out the door when pursuing enhanced physique development.
Risk management, whilst still getting jacked, is what we aim for!